Simultaneous Observations of EIP, TGF, Elve, and Optical Lightning

DOI: 
10.1029/2020JD033921
Publication date: 
24/06/2021
Main author: 
Østgaard, N.
IAA authors: 
Luque, A.
Authors: 
Østgaard, N.;Cummer, S. A.;Mezentsev, A.;Luque, A.;Dwyer, J.;Neubert, T.;Reglero, V.;Marisaldi, M.;Kochkin, P.;Sarria, D.;Lehtinen, N.;Ullaland, K.;Yang, S.;Genov, G.;Chanrion, O.;Christiansen, F.;Pu, Y.
Journal: 
Journal of Geophysical Research (Atmospheres)
Publication type: 
Article
Volume: 
126
Pages: 
e33921
Abstract: 
On February 8, 2019, the Atmosphere-Space Interaction Monitor observed a terrestrial gamma-ray flash (TGF) and an Elve from a positive intracloud (+IC) lightning during the initial breakdown stage of a lightning flash north east of Puerto Rico. A second Elve produced by the return stroke (RS) of a negative cloud-to-ground (−CG) lightning was observed 456 ms later about 300 km south of the first one. Radio measurements show that a short (30 μs) and large (280 kA km) energetic in-cloud pulse (EIP) produced the electromagnetic (EM) wave for the first Elve while the RS of the −CG was the EM source for the second Elve. Assuming that the EIP and the RS were the sources of the 777 nm emissions, both the delay relative to the ultra-violet pulse and the shape and duration of the 777 nm emissions can be explained by scattering and absorption inside the clouds. The TGF produced by the +IC lightning had the same duration as the EIP (∼30 μs). Due to the ±80 μs timing uncertainty of the TGF, we can only state that TGF was produced just before or most likely simultaneously with the EIP. The large 777 nm pulse indicates that a large part of the EIP was produced by a current flowing in a hot channel, but it is likely that the TGF current also contributed significantly to the EIP.
Database: 
ADS
URL: 
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2021JGRD..12633921O/abstract
ADS Bibcode: 
2021JGRD..12633921O
Keywords: 
Elves;energetic in-cloud pulse;lightning;terrestrial gamma-ray flashes